Science Pitch Deck — Best of the studies
A condensed view of the strongest results and the mechanisms, in presentation format. Built for a busy reader, a partner or an investor.
The science of Q-Technology
What is proven. What we observe. What we explore.
No promise we cannot demonstrate. Here are our scientific foundations, our field observations and our exploratory research — freely available, methodology and limits included. Every claim is labeled by its level of evidence.
Proven · peer-reviewed literature
Observed · internal testing
Hypothesis · exploratory
If you read only one thing
The science pitch deck
The essentials in one document: the most telling observations — literature, internal testing, field — condensed and labeled by level of evidence. The best place to start to understand what Q-Technology actually does.
How it actually works
The mechanisms of action
A passive circuit — no battery, no electrode — that communicates with the nervous system by bypassing the classic exteroceptors. The mechanism of action explained in detail, without needless jargon and without overpromising.
Mechanisms of action of Q-Technology
The full picture: passive resonant circuit, a physical signature measurable with instruments, action on the central nervous system, and the four biophysical profiles. A clear distinction between what is established, observed and hypothetical.
Full transparency
All the studies, freely available
Every document downloadable, methodology and limits included. These are pilot studies — exploratory, honest about their limits, and set to grow with more participants. Our multi-subject compilations sit alongside our longitudinal series and our n=1 observations; the conflict of interest is declared where it applies.
Asymmetry ÷ 2 to ÷ 5
The weaker side rebalances — observed across 6 independent subjects
Across a series of isometric strength tests on a dynamometer (Kinvent), run on 6 people and several muscle groups (shoulder, knee, psoas), it is the weaker side that gains most: left/right asymmetry collapses immediately with the technology (e.g. 15.9% → 4.1%).
Uncontrolled series (fixed order, no blinding) — randomized blinded replication planned. Functional observations, internal data.
Strength & motor control · multi-subject series (Kinvent)
Shoulder abduction — Jon
Dynamometer: peak force up on both sides, asymmetry roughly halved.
Shoulder abduction — Karine
Same test, 2nd subject: the weaker side responds most.
Knee extension — Stéphane
Quadriceps: left/right asymmetry cut ~4× (15.9% → 4.1%).
Knee extension — Evan
Quadriceps, another subject: clear gain on the weaker side.
Knee flexion — Élodie
Hamstrings: weaker side strengthened, asymmetry cut ~5× (11.2% → 2.2%).
Knee flexion — Evan
Hamstrings, another subject: rebalancing consistent with the series.
Psoas — Régis
Psoas in external rotation: strong response on the weaker side; structural argument against warm-up.
Neuroprotective inhibition · muscle testing
Muscle test & protective inhibition
The “neuroprotective brake”: release of inhibition observed under manual testing.
EEG of the muscle test (deltoid)
Frontal EEG signature during a manual muscle test, with and without the technology.
Brain states · EEG
Meditation — EEG (Barbara)
Frontal spectral composition during a guided meditation.
Cervical — EEG
Frontal EEG and cervical mobility side by side.
Meditation Q-Theta
Meditative state: EEG ratios (theta/beta) by condition.
Nap — EEG
EEG dynamics of a short nap.
Torus — EEG
Frontal EEG during screen work, circuits at the feet and/or skull.
Physiology, energy & recovery
EMF — screen exposure
Full re-analysis: EEG, optical and cardiac under computer exposure.
Q-One — Body Battery
Daily recovery (Garmin): it's the floor that lifts.
Sleep
Sleep architecture and continuity, with and without the technology.
VO2max
Tracking of estimated aerobic capacity.
Gait
In-depth gait analysis: oscillation and symmetry.
Flares — longitudinal observation
Single-subject observation over time. Strictly observational — no medical claim.
Transparency note. These are pilot studies. The Strength series (Kinvent) covers several independent subjects on a dynamometer, but remains uncontrolled (fixed order, no blinding). The EEG, physiological and longitudinal observations are single-subject (N = 1); where the subject is also the inventor, the conflict of interest is declared. All are exploratory — they generate hypotheses to confirm, and the body of work will grow with more participants and randomized blinded protocols. No medical claim.